Skip to content

September 2, 2026

Why most failed searches were unwinnable on day one

A clinical seat sitting empty costs an outpatient practice somewhere between $15,000 and $25,000 a month in unbilled revenue. Most of them stay empty for reasons that were knowable before anyone posted the job.

I've watched this happen from the inside for close to thirty years. The search doesn't collapse in week ten. It was already lost in week one, and nobody looked.

Four things cause it, over and over.

The pay was benchmarked against the wrong place

An employer pulls a national median, or a state figure, or whatever a salary site returned, and sets a band against it.

But a physical therapist in Portland, Maine is not competing in the same market as one in Boston, and neither is competing against a national median. The national figure for physical therapists sits around $102,760. Maine's mean runs meaningfully below that. Massachusetts runs near it, but Greater Boston clinics advertise well above it. A band that looks reasonable against one benchmark is a pay cut against another.

Worse, the setting matters as much as the geography. Outpatient private practice pays less than hospitals, nursing and residential care, and home health — by $9,000 to $18,000 at the national median. Benchmarking an outpatient role against an all-settings number produces a band that reads fine on paper and loses every competitive situation.

Headcount was mistaken for supply

This is the one that catches people hardest.

A market has 1,140 physical therapists. Sounds like plenty. But how many work in your setting? How many have your specialty? How many would consider a change, and how many of those are within a reasonable drive?

I worked a pediatric early intervention search in upstate New York where the raw count looked healthy. Statewide, only 19% of licensed therapists work in early intervention, down from 25% five years earlier. Narrow to pediatric capability in one metro and the realistic addressable pool was plausibly a few dozen people, nearly all of them employed.

The headcount wasn't wrong. It was just answering a different question than the one that mattered.

The real competition was never mapped

Employers map their competition by looking at businesses like themselves. An outpatient clinic lists other outpatient clinics.

That's usually the wrong list.

In the early intervention search, the real competitor wasn't another EI agency. It was school districts — better schedule, pension, benefits, no driving. They'd been absorbing that workforce for a decade. Beating another agency's rate doesn't touch that problem.

In outpatient orthopedics outside Boston, the competition includes the hospital outpatient department paying $10,000 more for the same license, and it includes four boutique clinics running the exact same one-on-one pitch within a twenty-minute drive.

If you don't know what you're actually competing against, you can't build a message that beats it.

The territory crossed a line candidates won't

A posting covers two counties, or a role is written to serve two sites, and the assumption is that one hire covers both.

Therapists don't work that way. Seventy-five minutes between two population centers is usually two separate labor markets, and candidates rarely cross. Building one search across two labor sheds means running two searches badly instead of one well.

None of this requires a phone call to discover

That's the part worth sitting with. Every one of these is findable in a week of research, before a single candidate is contacted. Wage data, setting differentials, participation rates, competing postings, drive times — all of it is public, and almost none of it gets checked.

So the search launches, the posting goes up, six weeks pass, and the conclusion is that the market is tight.

Sometimes it is. More often the market was fine and the search was aimed wrong.

I'd rather know in week one.

Back to insights